Patrick Byrne Raises Alarm: Allegations of Voter Manipulation, Foreign Servers, and Back-End Virtual Machines in the 2024 Trump vs. Kamala Election

Brad. M

11/3/20242 min read

In recent statements, Patrick Byrne, former CEO of Overstock and a long-time associate of Donald Trump, has raised significant concerns regarding the integrity of the Dominion voting system, particularly in the context of the upcoming 2024 presidential election between Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Byrne alleges that this system may have been compromised in the past, resulting in altered vote counts, and suggests that similar tactics could be employed in the forthcoming election.

Hypothetical Manipulation Scenario:

1. Creating a Pretext for Update:

- Individuals assert that the Dominion voting machines are malfunctioning due to a “glitch” in the current firmware, convincing officials that an immediate update is necessary to ensure the accuracy of the vote counting.

2. Deploying the Malicious Update:

- Once the update is authorized, it could include malicious code designed to grant the manipulators control over the voting machines, allowing them to alter the vote tallies undetected during the counting process.

3. Utilizing Back-End Virtual Machines:

- After the update is executed, the manipulators access back-end virtual machines (VMs) hosted on foreign servers. These VMs allow them to interact with the voting system without being traced, enabling real-time data manipulation without direct visibility on the main voting infrastructure.

4. Real-Time Vote Manipulation:

- While the counting is in progress, individuals manipulate incoming vote data through the VMs. For example, if Trump is initially set to receive 1,000 votes and Harris 800, the modified system could be adjusted to reflect 900 votes for Trump and 900 votes for Harris, thereby skewing the outcome.

5. Erasing Digital Footprints:

- After completing the manipulation, the individuals terminate the VM sessions. This action, coupled with the use of proxies or VPNs to mask their locations, ensures that no digital evidence remains, complicating any potential investigations into the integrity of the election process.

Byrne’s insights appear to be informed by his connections within federal law enforcement, notably the FBI, which likely provided him access to critical information regarding the operational vulnerabilities of Dominion systems. Furthermore, he has been an outspoken advocate against market manipulation, aligning himself with retail investors to combat illegal short-selling practices perpetrated by hedge funds targeting Overstock.

A particularly alarming aspect of Byrne's claims pertains to the personnel associated with Vice President Kamala Harris. He alleges that her team is comprised of former advisors to President Obama, suggesting a strategic continuity that could influence the election's outcome. Byrne warns that should Trump appear positioned for a substantial electoral victory, these advisors may enact measures to alter the election dynamics.

As questions arise regarding the Supreme Court's willingness to permit challenges to election results based on these claims, the implications of Byrne's allegations warrant careful scrutiny. Previous legal arguments have suggested that the Dominion voting systems may possess vulnerabilities that could be exploited for manipulative purposes. It is imperative that stakeholders monitor the vote-counting process with vigilance, documenting any irregularities or discrepancies to uphold electoral integrity.