Reevaluating Fluoride: Health Risks, Environmental Impact, and the Future of Water Fluoridation.

Brad. M

10/7/20244 min read

The addition of fluoride to drinking water has been a widely accepted public health measure for decades, aimed at preventing tooth decay. Dentists, manufacturers, and public health officials have long promoted fluoride as beneficial for dental health. However, recent scientific studies suggest that the practice may pose significant risks, particularly for children.

A systematic review by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Toxicology Program (NTP) in August 2024 highlighted concerns about fluoride exposure. The NTP's findings suggest that fluoride levels in drinking water as low as 1.5 mg/L are consistently associated with lower IQ in children. Though the current U.S. standard for fluoride in drinking water is 0.7 mg/L, uncertainty remains about whether this level is safe for children. This has raised ethical and medical questions about whether fluoridating public drinking water is advisable.

Historically, fluoride pollution has been a significant environmental issue. In the mid-20th century, industrial processes, particularly aluminum, fertilizer, and steel production, generated large amounts of fluoride waste. Factories often disposed of this waste by releasing it into rivers, lakes, and oceans, causing environmental harm. Fluoride contamination affected water supplies, farmland, and livestock, leading to regulatory action against companies that violated environmental laws. In response, regulatory bodies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) imposed stricter rules on fluoride emissions and waste disposal.

Some critics argue that water fluoridation, introduced in the 1940s, may have been influenced by the need to manage industrial fluoride waste. While the primary motivation for water fluoridation was public health, there is controversy over whether it also served as a solution for disposing of industrial fluoride byproducts. This remains a contentious issue, especially as new studies question the long-term health impacts of fluoride consumption.

In light of the recent NTP findings, the legal landscape surrounding fluoride in drinking water is shifting. In 2016, environmental groups, including Food & Water Watch, filed a petition with the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), seeking regulation of fluoride due to its potential health risks. Although the EPA initially denied the petition, a recent court ruling in September 2024 sided with the plaintiffs, determining that the addition of 0.7 mg/L of fluoride in drinking water poses an unreasonable risk to children. The court ordered the EPA to initiate rulemaking to address these concerns.

As public health officials and regulators reconsider the role of fluoride in drinking water, alternative methods for promoting dental health, such as fluoride-free products, diet adjustments, and improved dental hygiene practices, may gain more traction. Balancing the benefits of fluoride with its potential risks, especially to vulnerable populations like children, will remain a critical challenge for policymakers moving forward.

Water fluoridation is promoted as a major public health success, credited with preventing tooth decay and benefiting millions. However, what is often not discussed are the chemicals used in the fluoridation process and their potential impacts. Fluoride is typically introduced into drinking water through industrial byproducts such as fluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate, and sodium fluoride. These compounds, particularly fluorosilicic acid, are primarily sourced from the phosphate fertilizer industry, raising questions about the safety of fluoridation, especially when considering the potential for trace contaminants in these chemicals, such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

Fluoride Compounds in Water Treatment:


1. Fluorosilicic Acid (H2SiF6)

- Source: Byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production.

- Function: When added to water, fluorosilicic acid dissociates into fluoride ions, which help in preventing dental cavities.

- Risks: High fluoride levels from fluorosilicic acid can lead to dental fluorosis, which affects the appearance of teeth. More severe exposure can cause skeletal fluorosis, a condition that results in bone stiffness and pain. Over time, excessive fluoride consumption is also linked to cognitive concerns in children.


2. Sodium Fluorosilicate (Na2SiF6)

- Source: Dry powdered version of fluorosilicic acid, easier to store and transport.

- Function: It also dissociates into fluoride ions in water, delivering the same benefits and risks as fluorosilicic acid.

- Risks: Prolonged exposure can contribute to the same conditions as above, with skeletal fluorosis being a particular concern in regions with naturally high fluoride levels in water.


3. Sodium Fluoride (NaF)

- Source: Historically used in water fluoridation before being replaced by fluorosilicic acid.

- Function: Releases fluoride ions into the water supply.

- Risks: Excessive exposure to sodium fluoride poses similar health risks, including fluorosis and potential developmental impacts.


Trace Contaminants in Fluoridation Chemicals:


Fluoride compounds, especially fluorosilicic acid, can contain trace amounts of heavy metals and other industrial byproducts. These contaminants are of particular concern because they can introduce additional health risks.


- Arsenic (As): A toxic element that can be present in small amounts in fluorosilicic acid. Arsenic exposure over time can increase the risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic health issues.


- Lead (Pb): Found in trace amounts in some water treatment chemicals, lead is especially harmful to children, leading to developmental delays, learning difficulties, and lower IQ.


- Cadmium (Cd): A heavy metal with the potential to cause kidney damage, weakened bones, and increased cancer risk with long-term exposure.


- Mercury (Hg): Another toxic heavy metal that can accumulate in the environment and cause neurological damage, kidney problems, and developmental issues, particularly in young children.


- Radionuclides: Radioactive isotopes occasionally found in industrial byproducts. Long-term exposure to these substances can increase cancer risks, particularly bone cancer.


Health Impacts of Fluoride and Its Compounds:


While fluoride at controlled levels is beneficial for dental health, especially in preventing cavities, higher concentrations can have serious health consequences.


- Dental Fluorosis: When fluoride levels are too high during childhood, it can lead to visible changes in the teeth, such as white spots, streaks, or brown stains (mild to severe dental fluorosis).


- Skeletal Fluorosis: Long-term exposure to high fluoride levels can cause calcification in bones, leading to joint stiffness, pain, and fractures. In severe cases, it can also lead to crippling deformities.


- Neurodevelopmental Concerns: Emerging research suggests that children exposed to elevated levels of fluoride may suffer from cognitive impairments, including lower IQ. This has led to calls for more stringent fluoride regulations.


- Endocrine Disruption: Fluoride may interfere with thyroid function, leading to hypothyroidism. This can affect metabolism, energy levels, and overall well-being, especially in individuals with pre-existing thyroid conditions.


Environmental Concerns:


The use of industrial byproducts in water fluoridation raises environmental concerns. Historically, industries like phosphate fertilizer plants faced scrutiny for discharging fluoride waste into waterways, causing ecological damage. Excessive fluoride in the environment can harm aquatic ecosystems, accumulate in soil, and affect wildlife. The decision to divert these waste products into public drinking water as a fluoridation agent has raised ethical and environmental questions, especially given the potential for unintended contamination.


Conclusion: The Need for Transparency:


While water fluoridation is hailed as a major public health initiative, the chemicals used and their potential impurities require closer examination. The presence of heavy metals and other contaminants in fluoridation compounds challenges the assumption that all fluoridation practices are inherently safe. Balancing the benefits of fluoride in preventing tooth decay with its broader health and environmental impacts is crucial. More research and transparency are needed to ensure that the public is fully informed about the potential risks associated with long-term fluoride exposure.

Lawsuit ---> https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/2024.09.24-Opinion.pdf